Quantum mechanics and quantum Hall effect on Riemann surfaces

SISSA/ISAS/lOO/93/EP

S \ Quantum mechanics and quantum

^ '■ Hall effect on Riemann surfaces

3 :
^ ,

^ ■ Roberto lengo"'^ and Dingping Li°

^ ; International School for Advanced studies, SISSA, 1-34014

^ ; Trieste, Italy"

^ ; Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, INFN, Sezione di Trieste,

^ ; Trieste, Italy^

cn :

^ ' Abstract

^ :

^ • The quantum mechanics of a system of charged particles inter-
On. acting with a magnetic field on Riemann surfaces is studied. We
(— I I explicitly construct the wave functions of ground states in the case
^ • of a metric proportional to the Chern form of the ^-bundle, and the
• rH , wave functions of the Landau levels in the case of the the Poincare
r> I metric. The degeneracy of the the Landau levels is obtained by using
' the Riemann-Roch theorem. Then we construct the Laughlin wave
function on Riemann surfaces and discuss the mathematical structure
hidden in the Laughlin wave function. Moreover the degeneracy of
the Laughlin states is also discussed.

1 Introduction

We study here the quantum mechanics of a system of charged particles hving
on a two dimensional surface and interacting with a magnetic field orthogonal
to the surface. When the surface is an infinite plane and the magnetic field is
constant, we have the well known problem of the Landau levels. This problem
has received a renewed interest in the context of the quantum Hall effect
(QHE)(for a review, see Ref. [|l|). In fact, the QHE appears to be related
to a rich physical and also mathematical structure, which is worthwhile to
investigate in various possible configurations.

A particular intriguing and interesting case occurs when the two dimen-
sional surface is a Riemann surface of high genus. Although not directly ac-
cessible to experiments, the problem of the physics on the Riemann surface
happens to have deep relations with modern investigations on some inter-
esting problems, like the occurrence of chaos in the surface with a negative
curvature 0, and recent developments in the theory of Riemann surfaces,
for example, the moduli of the surface and the vector bundles defined on the
moduli 0.

In this paper, we will explore the problem directly from the point of view
of quantum mechanics, by defining the Hamiltonian and then constructing
eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian. In Ref. the problem in the case of the
surface being an open hyperbolic plane with a constant negative curvature
was considered and Ref. discussed the scattering on a hyperbolic torus.
Instead, here we will mainly consider compact Riemann surfaces. Ref. P|
obtained some interesting results about eigenvalues and their multiplicity
of a particle interacting with the magnetic field, in the case of Riemann
surfaces of high genus with a constant curvature by using some results from
the mathematical literature, for example by using Selberg trace formula (for
a review on Selberg trace formula, see Ref. See also Ref. for a related
discussions.

We pursue this investigation by explicit construction, which allows us to
derive, and in some sense, generalize all known results in a straightforward
way and provides us also the wave functions of Landau levels. The wave
functions turn out to be the holomorphic line bundle defined on the surface,
or for the high Landau levels, they are obtained by applying some covari-
ant derivatives on the holomorphic line bundle. Actually, the holomorphic
line bundle can be defined without reference to a particular metric. Thus

1

although we consider mainly two cases for the metric, we can make some
possible interesting generalizations to metrics of other kinds, mainly for the
case of the ground states.

It is known that the fractional quantum Hall effect (FQHE) is related
to the properties of the ground states, through the Laughlin wave function.
We will show the construction of the Laughlin wave function on Riemann
surfaces and indicate some interesting relations with recent results appeared
in the mathematical literature 0.

We organize the paper as follows. In section 2, we use the Riemann-Roch
theorem to derive the degeneracy of the ground states of a particle interacting
with a constant magnetic field As we will see, the natural definition of a
constant magnetic field is to take it proportional to the area form. We
consider first the case of a metric which is proportional to the Chern form
of the 6'-function line bundle 0, defined explicitly in section 2. Since it is
expressed in terms of the canonical holomorphic one forms, we will call it
"canonical ^-metric", abbreviated as C6'M[]. In section 3, we construct the
Landau levels on the surface with the Poincare metric. The eigenvalues of the
Landau levels and their multiplicity are obtained. In section 4, we continue
the discussion of section 3 to construct the wave functions of the the Landau
levels. In section 5, we present the Laughlin wave function on high genus
surfaces with particular metrics. The mathematical structure hidden in the
Laughlin wave function is pointed out. In particular, we also discuss the
degeneracy of the Laughlin states.

2 The lowest Landau level on Riemann sur-
faces with the C^M metric

We consider a particle on a Riemann surface interacting with a "monopole"
field, that is the integral of the field strength out of the surface is different
from zero. We use the metric ds^ = Qzzdzdz in complex coordinates and
the volume form is dv = [igzz/'^]dz A dz = Qzzdx A dy. We apply a constant
magnetic field on the surface. The natural definition of the constant magnetic

^we understand there is not a standard name for this metric in the hterature. It is
proportional to the so caUed Bergman kernel, which is also proportional to the curvature
of the Arakelov metric.

2

field to the high genus Riemann surface]^ |T0| is

F = Bdv = {d,A, - d2A,)dz A dz,

with constant B. Thus d^A^ — d^A^ = igzzB/2. The flux $ is given by
27r$ = J F = BV, where V is the area of the surface and we assume here
-B > ($ > 0). The Hamiltonian of an electron on the surface under the
magnetic fleld is given by the Laplace-Beltrami operator,

H = [l/2m^{P^-A,)g^^^{P,-A,)
= [g^ym][{Pz-Az){P,-A,)

+{P,-A,)iPz-Az)] (1)
= [2g''/m]iPz-Az)iP,-A,) + [B/2m]

where g""^ = [l/g^z] and P^ = -id^, Pz = {d^ = {d^ - idy)/2). The

inner product of two wave functions is deflned as < ipi\ip2 >= / dvipi x ?/)2-

H' = [2g^^/ m] {Pz — Az){Pz — A^) is a positive deflnite hermitian operator
because < iIj\H'\iIj >> for any ip. Thus if H'lp = 0, then ip satisfles
(Pg — Az)ip = 0. The solutions of this equation are the ground states of the
Hamiltonian H or H', i.e. the lowest Landau level (LLL). The existence of the

solutions of this equation is guaranteed by the Riemann-Roch theorem [[11

. The solutions belong to the sections of the holomorphic line bundle under
the gauge fleld. The Riemann-Roch theorem tells us that h^{L) — h^{L) =
deg{L)—g+l, where h^{L) is the dimension of the sections of the holomorphic
line bundle or the degeneracy of the ground states of the Hamiltonian H,
h^{L) is the dimension of the holomorphic differential {L~^ x K) where K
is the canonical bundle and deg{L) is the degree of the line bundle which
is equal to the flrst Chern number of the gauge fleld, or the magnetic flux

out of the surface, When deg{L) > 2g — 2, h^{L) is equal to zero [111

and h^{L) = <^ — g + 1. As a consistent check, h^{L) indeed gives the right
degeneracy of the ground states in the case of a particle on the sphere and
torus interacting with a magnetic-monopole fleld.

If the Riemann surface S has g {g > 0) handles, there exist abelian
differentials, g holomorphic and g anti-holomorphic closed 1-forms, Ui and
cDj. They are normalized by

3

where Ai, Bi are a canonical homology basis or closed loops around handles
on S, and the imaginary part of f2 is a positive matrix. We consider the C^M
metric given by

= u){Imn)~^uj, (3)

which is always greater than zero. This metric is proportional to the Bergman
reproducing Kernel and it is also proportional to the curvature of the Arakelov
metric p. Its most interesting feature (for our study here) is that it is pro-
portional to the Chern form of the ^-function line bundle[§], implying the
covariant derivatives match the transformation properties of the 6'-function.
We note that

^ = J dxdy(jj{ImVL)~^uj = g. (4)

Let us take $ equal to 'yg. Because of Dirac quantization, 'yg must be an
integer and here we assume that 'jg is a positive integer. We will explicitly
construct the ground states in the case of 7 being a positive integer here
and the case of fractional 7 will be discussed in section 5.2. Now we have
B = 27r7 and Fzz = dzA^ — dzA^ = m'^uj{ImVL)~^uj . We can take Az =
injuj{ImQ)~^u/2, where = J^^ and Az = Az are the gauge potentials in
a certain gauge.

The ground states satisfy the equation,

D"^ = {d+ ^-fij{Imny^u)^ = 0. (5)

Because

D{u + ^In + m) = K(n,m)^^ D(u)K(n,m) (6)

with

K{n, m) = exp 7[S'(n, m) — S{n, m)]

and

S{n,m) = {TT/2)u{ImQ,)^^{Qn + m),
thus we can choose the boundary condition as [|T^],

K{n, m)\E'(M + Qn + m) = exp{ia{n, m))'${u). (7)

Generally we can take a{n,m) as

a{n, m) = i'jTmm + 2TTi'~faom — 2TTibon. (8)

4

We define the function

^ = exp[-{n/2)-fu{ImQ)-^u + {n/2)-fu{ImQ)-^u]F. (9)
Tlien tlie function F satisfies tlie equation,

F{u + Qn + m) = exp{—iTT'ynQn — 27T'ynu — i'-jTmm + ia{n, m))F{u). (10)
Tlie solutions of Eq. (|l^) are

(7w|7fi) (11)

with b = Bq and Oj = (ao)j + /i/7, /j = 0, ■ ■ ■ , 7 — 1 and i = 1, ■ ■ ■ , g. It seems
that there are 7^ solutions. However, from the Riemann-Roch theorem, we
know that the degeneracy is 7(7 — (? + 1 when 7 > 1 (remind that 7 is a
positive integer here, then we have 'jg > 2g — 2 and = 0). We observe
that when g = 1, 'j^ = •yg — g + 1 but 7^ > 7(7 — + 1 for 7 > 1 and g > I.
In fact, generally the solutions given by Eq. (pH]) are not linear-independent.
Take, for example, Fi given by

MyQ) , (12)

then consider Fi/Fi which are the meromorphic functions on the Riemann
surface S. Because Fi has jg zeros, for example, at Zi,i = l,---,75f, the
meromorphic functions will have possible poles at points Zj. The dimension
of such meromorphic functions is given by the Riemann-Roch theorem, the
number of the possible poles, jg, minus g — 1 in the case of 7 > 1, which
is equal to ■yg — g + 1 and is the degeneracy of the ground states. If 7 = 1,
according to Eq. ([Tl|) there is only one solution (it is possible that this solution
is identical to zero by the Riemann vanishing theorem and thus there will be
no solutions). We remark that if (ao)i = 1/2 , (6o)j = 7/2, the wave functions
are transformed covariantly by the modular transformations (for the case of
g = l, see Ref. H ).

FAu)

a
b

5

3 The Landau levels on Riemann surfaces with
the Poincare metric

When g > 1, the simply connected covering space of the surface S is the
upper half plane H (for example, Refs. [|l^, |^), and S is equal to H/T,
where F is the discreet subgroup of the isometry group of H, isomorphic to
the first homotopy of S. F is generated by the Fuchsian transformations
around a canonical homology basis, FAi,FB. with

f[TATBT-^]T-^] = l. (13)
1=1

The metric is given by the Poincare metric, ds"^ = y^'^{dx^ + dy^), and we
note that J dv = J y~'^dxdy = 27i{2g — 2) (without punctures). In the case
of the Poincare metric g^z = the curvature is constant:

g^'Rz, = -2g''ddlngz, = -1.

We take F = Bdv, and thus Az = —iBd{\n gz^) /2 and the flux $ is equal to
2B{g - 1). Then we define D = d- {B/2)d\n gzz and D = d+{B/2)d\n gzz-
The Hamiltonian is (we take m = 2 in Eq. (^ for the simplicity),

H = -g''DD + {B/4:). (14)

The eigenfunctions satisfy

= E^. (15)

If z is another local coordinate on S and the domain of z intersects non-
trivially the domain of z, gz^dzdz is invariant under coordinate changes, or

gzzdzdz = g^gdzdz (16)

on the intersection of the domains of z and z. D and D are transformed as

D = {dz/dz)U-^DU , b = {dz/dl)U~^DU (17)

where f/(z, 5) = [dz / dz)~^/'^{dz / dz)^^'^ . The Hamiltonian is transformed as

H = U~^HU, (18)

6

thus the wave function is transformed as

^ = U-^^ (19)

or '^{dz)^^'^(dz)^^^'^ is invariant under the transformation. So we conclude
that is a differential form of type Tg/2 • Furthermore, the wave function is
transformed under the Fuchsian transformations as

<i/{jz) =u{-f,z)^{z), u(7,z) =i/(5,7)(c2 + d)2^/|cz + d|2^ (20)

where 7 is a Fuchsian group element ^ ^ ^ ^ and 7^ = {az + b)/{cz + d).

z/(i?, — 1) = e^*^'^-^ and m(7i72,z) = ^(71, 72-2)^(72, -z) are the consistency
conditions ensuring univaluedness of the wave function on the universal cov-
ering space 0]. The boundary condition is twisted if z/(i?,7) 7^ 1. The
ground states are given by the solutions of the following equation,

L>*o = 0. (21)

/ 12'] ~ — ~ ~

The solutions of this equation are \E'o = 9zz ^0 with (9\E'o = 0. \E'o belongs

to a differential form of type Tg. According to Eq. (|20|) , \E'o is transformed

under the Fuchsian transformations as

^0(7-2) =w'(7,^)^o(^), M'(7,z) = z/(5,7)(cz + rf)'^ (22)

with z/(i?,7) defined in Eq. (^). When B = 1, Tb is the canonical holomor-
phic line bundle and \&o is given by the sections of the canonical holomorphic
line bundle. By the Riemann-Roch theorem, we have dimTs — dimTi^B =
{2B — l){g — 1), where dimTs is the dimension of the sections of the holo-
morphic bundle Tg. The dimension (or the degeneracy of the ground states)
of Ti is g for the non-twisted boundary condition and is g — 1 for the twisted
boundary condition (z/ 7^ 1), because dimTo = 1 for the non-twisted bound-
ary condition and dimTo = for the twisted boundary condition. When
B is an positive integer which is greater than one, the dimension of Tb is
{2B — l){g — 1) by the Riemann-Roch theorem {dirriTi^B = 0, as 1 — -B is
negative). When B = 1/2, T1/2 is 1/2-differentials (the spin bundle). The
dimension of T1/2 is generically one for the odd-spin structures and zero for
the even-spin structures. The energy of the ground states is 5/4. An expres-
sion for the wave functions will be described in the next section. There we

7

will also indicate generalizations to the case of fractional B, provided that
{2B — l){g — 1) is integer, and also possible generalizations to surfaces with
punctures.

Here and in the following, we call g = g^z for short. We introduce the
covariant derivative, V^, and its Hermitian conjugate (VzY — — V^,

(V.)t : n Ti_, , (V.)t = -g-'-'dgK (23)

Note that D is the covariant operator acting on T^'j^ {D — g'V^ where

acts on T^jl).

Let us next discuss the higher Landau levels. By writing

H-B/A^ -V^V^

we notice that if ^'i is an eigenfunction of H with eigenvalue Ei > B/A, then
^1 = _V^V^*i/ei (where ei = - 5/4 ^ 0). Therefore *i = for
some Of course, since ^'i is of the form ' then $ will be of the form
Tgy2-i- Thus we have, more explicitly,

*i = {d-{B/2-l)dlng)^.

Due to the property of the Poincare metric ddlng = g/2, one can easily show
that

-V,V^*i = + v,(-v,v^$).

When -B > 1, one can show that < *i| V2(-V^V^$) >> 0. It is thus clear
that the states of the lowest excited level are obtained, if there exist $ such
that V^V^* = 0, i.e. = 0. This means that $ = $o = 9~^^'^^o with
(9$o = 0. Since $o is of the form Tb_i, there exist solutions of the equation
9$o = for 5 > 1. The energy of the lowest excited states is thus

^ 4 2

The degeneracy of this Landau level is the dimension of the sections of the
holomorphic bundle Tb-i (which is equal to {2B — 3){g — 1) if B > 2) . When
B < 1, there is only the zero'th "Landau level" (the lowest Landau level).

8

Beyond the "Landau levels" , little is know about the spectrum. We will make
a comment about this point at the end of the present section.

We can generalize the above discussion to high Landau levels. The wave
function of the k'th Landau level is given by

= (V,)'=$o

= {d-{B/2-l)d\ng){d-{B/2-2)d\ng) (24)
■■■(d-(B/2-k)d\ng)%

with l>o = 5'^/^$o and d^o = 0. l>o is a differential form of the type Ts-k-
Notice that this construction generalizes the standard construction for the
harmonic oscillator. By using the relation, which holds for the Poincare
metric,

[V^ VjT- = -(m + n)/2, (25)

one can explicitly check that ^'^ is the eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian, with
the eigenvalue as

Ek = [B{2k + 1) - k{k + l)]/4. (26)

The degeneracy of the k'th Landau level is given by the dimension of the
sections of the holomorphic bundle of the type TB-k, which is equal to {2B —
2k — l){g — 1) when B — k > 1. Because the dimension of T„ is zero when n is
negative, k must not be greater than B. Hence there is only a finite number
of " Landau levels" .

When B is an integer, k can take value from to B. When k — B, the
corresponding is the (holomorphic) differential form of the type Tq. Tq
is a constant function on the surface. We can also include twisted bound-
ary conditions, which would physically correspond to the presence of some
magnetic flux through the handles. If the boundary condition of the wave
function is the twisted one, there does not exist a non-zero constant function
which satisfies the twisted boundary condition. Thus the dimension of Tq is
zero in this case and there is not the B'th Landau level. When k = B — 1,
the degeneracy of this Landau level is the dimension of the canonical bundle
Ti, which is equal to g for the non- twisted boundary condition and is equal
to g — 1 for the twisted boundary condition. B can be also an half-integer.
Then k can take value from to B - (1/2). When k ^ B - (1/2), the de-
generacy of this Landau level is the dimension of the spin bundle Ti/2- The
dimension of the holomorphic sections of the spin bundle generically is zero
for the even-spin structures and one for the odd ones (or for twisted ones).

9

In the next section, we will show a construction of the wave functions
and we will see that it is possible to generalize the present scheme also to
the case of B fractional, provided a condition is satisfied, and to include also
"punctures" on the surface. We will also discuss the resulting spectrum of
the Landau levels in the general case.

Of course, the "Landau levels" that we have found by the above method
do not exhaust the spectrum. In fact, when k has reached the maximum
value for which s = B — k is positive or zero, we can still express \E' =
V^5'~^^^$ where $ is a T, differential and get an additional infinity of levels
and corresponding wave functions by the solutions of the eigenvalue equation
for — V^V^^n = En^n- The corresponding eigenvalues for \l/ will he E =
^{B{2k + 1) — k{k + 1)) + En- In particular, for an integer B, this will relate
the general solution of our problem to the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of
the Laplacian on the scalar (i.e. the zero forms) on the Riemann surface with
the Poincare metric, a problem which is not completely solved and for which
there exists a vast literature ( for a recent review see Ref. [Q).

4 The wave functions of the Landau levels

In order to complete the construction of the wave functions of the "Landau
levels" of the last section, we would like to describe ^q, that is the holo-
morphic sections of the bundle corresponding to the differential of the type
Tg. We will present a formula for the determinant det hi{zj), where hi are
the independent holomorphic sections and i,j run over the degeneracy of the
Landau level. To get a particular wave function, it is of course enough to
consider this determinant as a function of a particular z, fixing arbitrarily
the remaining ones. We have anticipated from the Riemann-Roch theorem
that the degeneracy is = {2s — l){g — l), for s integer or half integer greater
than 1, the cases s = 1, s = 1/2, s = corresponding respectively to the
g abelian differential, to the holomorphic spin structure(s) and to the con-
stant respectively, as recalled above. The following formula does not make
reference to any particular metric, as the notion of holomorphic differentials
is introduced in a metric independent fashion.

The formula can be read from Ref. [|T5|, and it has been obtained in a

contest of String theory, following the work of Knizhnik[jl6[. It is

10

det hi{zj]

9-1 \ 3-1

2s-l

i=l I i=l

N 9-1

xllE{z.,z,)/Y[Y[{E{z.,ri))

i<j i=l 1=1

2s-l

(27)

where I'oiz) is a holomorphic half-differential with g — 1 zeros, corresponding
to an arbitrary (but fixed) odd characteristic and I'oiri) = 0, i = 1, ■ ■ ■ , g — 1.
The symbol E{zi,Zj) denotes the "prime form", which is a —1/2 differential

and it has only one zero for Zi = Zj (for a review of definitions and transfor-
mation properties of the theta functions, prime forms etc., see for instance
Ref. |T^). Recall that hi{z) is the solution of the following equation.

Dg-''^h{z) = g-''''dh{z

-s/2'

(28)

with D = d + {s/2)d\ng. What we discuss now is valid for any metric, not
only for the Poincare metric. The above equation implies that

N

(29)

i=l

Thus with respect to the coordinate Zi, the function det hi{zj) shall be a form
of type Tg, which we can show directly from Eq. (p7|). Because the prime
form is a (—1/2) form and z/q is a 1/2 form.

-(2s
2^

l)--((2.-l)((7

l)_l) + (2s-l)(^-l)

(30)

which is the type of the form with respect to every coordinate Zi.

It is seen that it is indeed holomorphic, the zeroes in the denominator are
canceled by corresponding zeroes in the numerator.

The variable in the theta function is (X^Wj — (2s — 1) Y^fll r^). We write
the theta function in this way because the phase obtained by moving the co-
ordinates around handles will be independent on the zeros in this format
(this is only for the convenience). We can also absorb it into the character-
istics. In contrast to the case when the magnetic field is proportional to the
COM metric, in the present case the gauge potential = —isd{\ng)/2 is
single-valued around the handles. Thus the boundary condition shall be

hi{u + Qn + m) = exp(an + (3m)hi{u).

(31)

11

The above equation implies that

det hi{uj + Qn + m) = exp(an + /3m) det hiiuj). (32)

The right side of Eq. ( P?] ) indeed transforms around the handles in the way
described by Eq. (|3^). The values of are determined by the type of the
odd characteristic z/q and the values of the characteristics a, h of the theta
function. Therefore by using Eq. (0), the characteristics a and h in Eq. (p7|)
can be fixed uniquely.

By Eq. (p2D, it is easy to show that det hi{zj) shall transform in the case
of the Poincare metric under the Fuchsian transformations as

det hii^'yzj) = ^'(7, z) det hi{zj), (33)

where ^'(7, z) is given by Eq. (0). We can check that Eq. ( pT]) transforms in
the way of Eq. (|33| ) in the case of the Poincare metric. The transformations
of the prime form and half -differential under the Fuchsian transformations
can be found in Ref. 1/(5,7) corresponds to the boundary condition
parameters and the characteristics a and b in Eq. (^) are fixed by 1/(5,7).

The formula Eq. (pT]) makes sense also for s fractional, provided that N =
{2s — l){g — 1) is a positive integer, giving the multiplicity of the level (apart
from the particular case s = 1 recalled above), for generic characteristics
a, b corresponding to twisted boundary conditions. The value of s for this
case is s > 1/2. The dual line bundle will be a form of the type with
V = 1 — s < 1/2. Ifs>l, since there are no holomorphic Ty forms with f < 0,

is the multiplicity for any characteristic. In the case where 1 > s > 1/2,
then 1/2 > V > 0, and for the generic moduli of the Riemann surface, there
will be one holomorphic T„ form for some characteristics. Thus, for these
characteristics, the multiplicity of the level corresponding to Tg will be iV + 1.
The formula for the wave function would be in this generalization of Eq.

( pTl) 01 . For those characteristics there exists also a Landau level, generically
with multiplicity 1, for those s < 1/2 for which (1 — 2s){g — 1) is a positive
integer.

Since s = B — k (recalled from the last section), this means that we find
Landau levels provided that {2B — l){g — 1) is a positive integer, or, with
some characteristics, that {l — 2B){g — l) is a nonnegative integer (remember
that we assume B > 0). Therefore the general condition for the existing of

12

Landau levels is that 2B{g — 1) is integer, that is the Dirac quantization
condition. We remind that the energy of the level is

Ek = ^{B{2k + l)-k{k + l))

corresponding to s = B — k. Thus we see that the Landau level of maximal
energy is obtained for the value of k which is nearest to 5 — 1/2. If is
integer then the maximal energy is if B is half integer the maximal

energy is + 1/4). If B is another allowed fraction, the maximal energy
is intermediate between the previous two.

This discussion about Eq. (p7|) can be further generalized to the case of
"punctures", which formally corresponds to the possibility of allowing poles
for $0 at some points of the surface, with the understanding that those
points are infinitely far (with the Poincare metric) from any other points.
This means that the puncture can be taken at infinity or on the real axis
in the upper half-plane, the surface making a narrow cusp there such that
the area is still finite. Thus this discussion makes now use of a particular
metric on the Riemann surface. Quantum mechanically we require the wave
function to be normalizable and (taking the puncture at infinity) this implies
for a differential requiring (?/^)'^~^|Tsp to be integrable in y for y oo.
This means that the poles of Tg can be of order s at most, since a pole
of order r a.t z = oo would imply limy^oo Tg ~ y^~'^''^ as it is seen by the
appropriate change of chart. If we allow for punctures at say Wi,...,Wn,
we have the freedom of generalizing Eq. (^) by multiplying the r.h.s by
Y[iY[i{E{zi,Wi))~'^ and subtracting (sj^'u^i) from the argument of the theta
function (this insures that ( ^2] ) continues to hold). This construction gives
again a differential provided now = {2s — l){g — l)+ns, which is the new
multiplicity of the level (we should be aware that N = (2s — 1)(5' — 1) + ns
may not be true in the case of s < 1. See the previous discussion).

Finally, a further generalization could consist in allowing for some twists
on the punctures, corresponding to considering branch points rather than
poles at wi.

5 The Laughlin wave function on Riemann
surfaces

13

5.1 The Laughlin wave functions in the constant field
on the surface with the Poincare metric

In the present section, we will discuss the Laughlin wave functions in the
constant field on the surface with the Poincare metric. In the next subsection,
the Laughlin states in the constant magnetic field will be worked out in the
case of the magnetic field which is proportional to the C^M metric. The
mathematical structure behind the Laughlin wave functions will be discussed
in the end of this subsection. We shall remark that the following discussions
can be generalized to the case of the magnetic field being proportional to the
curvature, if we take the Hamiltonian in a special ordering.

with Az = —iBd{\ng)/2 and g is an arbitrary metric. The magnetic field is
a constant one if the curvature is constant, for example, in the case of the
Poincare metric (see the last section). The generalization is straight forward
and we will not discuss it here.

Following section 3, we take F^z = iBddlng, Az = —iBd{lng)/2 and g >
1. The ground states satisfy the equation, D'^q = and the solution of the
equation is \E'o = 9^^^^^o with d'^o = 0. \E'o is Tb differentials. hi{z) are the
solutions of the equation d'^o = 0. In the FQHE, the magnetic field apphed
is very strong. Thus i? is a very large number and the number of the sections
of the holomorphic Tb differentials is equal to {2B — l){g — l). If the ground
states are completely filled, which corresponds to the case of the quantum
Hall state with filling z/ = 1, the wave function of the quantum Hall state is
given by = Ui=i g'^^^ZiZi) det h,{zj) where i = 1, ■ ■ ■ , (25 - 1)(^ - 1)
{"^jL stands for the Jastrow-Laughlin type wave function).

A formula for det hi{zj) has been shown and discussed in the previ-
ous section, see Eq. (^Tf) . For any quantum Hall state, we write ^^jx, =
Yli^i g^~^^'^\ziZi)'i!'j and "^'j is a holomorphic function of the coordinates of
any electrons, as "^jl satisfies the equation Dz^^ jl = (we have this equa-
tion because every electron stays in the LLL). The boundary condition, Eq.
( pOD or Eq. (p^ for the single particle implies a boundary condition on the
many-body wave function (here is the wave function of the Hall state).

H

g'^DD

(34)

(35)

14

with m'(7, z) given by by Eq. (^). Furthermore, by using Eq. (|35|), the char-
acteristics a and b in Eq. (|27|) can be fixed uniquely. Hence the degeneracy of
the Hall state at filling z/ = 1 is one (from the physical points of view, there
is only one way to completely fill the lowest Landau levels).

If the filling is equal to 1/m, we make an Ansatz for the wave function.

JL

Ui=ig

(-B/2),

JL

9-1 \ 9-1

mY,u,-QY.r,\mQ\ X{{vo{zi)f'

1=1 / i=l

N N g-l

(36)

i=l 1=1

where is the number of the electrons. Qi must be equal to Q2, otherwise,
there will be singularities at r,. The way we write the theta function in Eq.

(36) is based on the intuition from the wave function on the torus. Moreover,
under the Fuchsian transformation, Eq. (|36| ) shall be transformed as Eq. (|35|).
This implies that = Q2 = 2B-m and m{N-l+g) = 2B{g-l) = And
we take Q = Qi for the same reason in the case of = 1. The characteristics
a and b are determined by the boundary condition, which gives

bo, a = ao + l/m, li

,9,

(37)

where oq and 60 depend on the boundary value parameters a and The
above equation does not imply that the degeneracy of the Laughlin wave
functions is m^. According to the second section, the linear- independent
number of the functions

9-1

i=l

(38)

is mg — g + 1 and thus the degeneracy is actually mg — g + 1

There is a deep mathematical structure behind the Laughlin wave func-
tions. In the case of = 1, we know the wave function is given by the
determinant of the sections of the holomorphic line bundle. In the case of
u = m with m greater than 1, the Laughlin wave functions is given by the
determinant of the sections of the holomorphic rank-m vector bundle. The
discussion about the determinant of the sections of the holomorphic vector
bundle can be found in Ref. HI.

15

We consider a line bundle with connection A'^ = —iB'd\ng/2 (thus $' =
^B'lg — 1) is the corresponding magnetic flux and is a positive integer).
We take B' = B/m for the reasons to be seen later. Under the Fuchsian
transformations, the transformations of the line bundle are given by Eq. (pO|)
with the replacement of B by B'. We also introduce a flat vector bundle
of rank-m with a flat connection. The flat vector bundle '^{'-fz)^ transforms
under the Fuchsian transformations as

m
i=l

where xil) is a constant matrix. We define a vector bundle E as the tensor
product of the line bundle and the flat vector bundle. The vector bundle
then is transformed under the Fuchsian transformations as,

m

v^(7z)fc = E«(7,^)H^W^ ui^,z) = u{B',^){cz + dy^'/\cz + d\'^' (39)
1=1

where 7 is a Fuchsian group element and z/(i?', 7) is now SLinxm matrix. Fol-
lowing the discussion about the line bundle, we shall have z/(i?', —1) = e"*^'^^
and m(7i72,-2) = m (71, 72^)^(72, 2;) are the consistency conditions ensuring
univaluedness of the wave function on the universal covering space. The
holomorphic sections of the vector bundle is the solution of the following
equation,

(P,, - 4)^(z) = 0. (40)

where "^{z) is a m-dimension vector with the component \1/(2;)a:. The degree
of the vector bundle is deg{E) = m x $' = $. We assume here $' or $ is
much larger than one (because we apply a very strong magnetic field in the
FQHE), is zero by the Kodaira vanishing theorem, which states that there
do not exist the sections of the one-form holomorphic vector bundle or the
holomorphic vector bundle x K where E is the vector bundle and K is
the canonical bundle. It is possible to see that the vector bundle E~^ x K

is negative 1 18]. Then by the Kodaira vanishing theorem, the dimension of

the sections of the holomorphic vector bundle E x is zero|]18|. From the
Riemann-Roch theorem for the vector bundles, the dimension of the sections
of the holomorphic vector bundle is h^{E) = h^{E) + deg{E) + m(l — g) =
^ + m{l — g). Suppose the basis of the vector bundle is given by "^i^z)

16

with i = 1, • ■ ■ , h^{E), we can construct a determinant, det "^{{zj) with j =
1, ■■■,N and N = h°{E)/m.
One can show that

adet(A„) = Edet(A:,(A;)) (41)

k

where the matrix A - is given by A - .^(/c) = Ajj, i k and A'l^j^k) = dA^j.
By using Eq. (|4l|) and Eq. (^OD , we can prove that

(Pj,-m4) det ^,(z,) = 0. (42)

det "^iizj) is an anti-symmetric functions with respect to the interchange of
any coordinates Zi and zj. Thus the above equation shows that det\l/j(zj)
is the wave function of the electrons interacting with the magnetic field
mA'^ = Az- The flux out of surface of this magnetic field A^ is equal to
$ = m$'. We shall show that det "^{{zj) is a Laughlin type wave function.
Furthermore, we have a relation m{N — 1 + (?) = $ and the above discussions
offer a mathematical explanation of this relation for the Laughlin states. This
relation had been used to calculate the spin of the quasiparticle in Ref. [|T9|
and the value of the spin is found to be topological independent.

Now we shall prove that det "^iizj) is a Laughlin type wave function. By
Eq. (|39D , one can also show that

det '^ii'yzj) = det(z/(S, 7))(czj + d)^'^/\czj + d\'^^ det ^iizj) (43)

with det(z/(i?, — 1)) = e"*^'^'^. Thus det\E'.j(zj) transforms in the same way
as the Laughlin wave function \E'jl- Moreover, when Zi — > zj, we can easily
show that det "^{{zj) {zi — Zj)"^. Thus the function obtained by taking the
ratio of det ^i{zj) with

3-1 N N N g-1

n {Mz^)r-'^ n (^(^^^ / n a^^^z,. z^) n n (^(^^^ ,

i=\ i<j i=l i=l 1=1

has no poles. By using Eq. (40), one can show that this function is an holo-
morphic function of coordinates Zi. Furthermore, by using Eq. (^), we find
that this function transforms exactly in the way as the theta functions in Eq.
(pHf). This holomorphic function must be equal to one of the theta functions

17

in Eq. (|38|). Thus we complete our prove that det ^i{zj) is a Laughhn type
wave function. Similar arguments, for example in Ref. |2^, had been used
in proving some identities.

From the discussion of the previous section, B can be fractional in the
above formulae (the above Laughlin wave functions make sense even B is
fractional), but N and $ must be integers.

We comment that the construction of the Laughlin wave function by the
determinant of the sections of the holomorphic vector bundle can also apply
to the case of (7 = 0, 1. It seems to us that the degeneracy of Laughlin wave
functions is related to the different choice of the basis of the sections of the
holomorphic vector bundle. Finally we shall point out that the hierarchical
wave function on the Riemann surface can also be constructed by following

the method developed in Ref. [21

5.2 The Laughlin wave functions in the constant field
on the surface with the C^M metric

Following the first section, we take Fzz = dzA^ — dzAz = iiT'yu{ImQ)^^LJ.
Az = iTx^u){ImVL)^^U /2. The ground states are given by

X{u) = exp[-{n/2)-fu{ImQ)-\ + {7i/2)-fu{Imn)-\], (44)

where i = 1, ■ ■ ■ — g + 1 and we assume here that 7 > 1 and 7 is an
integer. We remark that the following formula for the wave function is true
also in the case of fractional 7 and 'jg > 2g — 2 (remind that 'yg is always
an integer). Fi are the linear independent solutions of Eq. (p!oD . The wave
function of the electrons when the first Landau levels (or ground states) are
completely filled (the filling is equal to 1 in this case) is then

^,=1 = det iX{u,)F,{uj)) = UXiui) det (F,(m,)) . (45)

i

det {Fi{uj)) can be calculated even we do not know how to select Fi{u), the
linear independent solutions of Eq. (p^Of ). According to Ref. 0, det {Fi{uj))
is equal to

e

a
b

N

(j2u?)l[E{z,,z,)f{z^,---,ZN), (46)

18

where = 'yg — g + 1, f{zi, zj) = f{zj, Zi) and f{zi) has no zeros with respect
to any coordinates. The function f{zi) can be determined by the boundary
condition. From Eq. (|TU|), we have

det {Fi{uj + Qn + m)) = exp{—iiT'~fnQn — 27T'ynUj

—i'^nnm + ia{n, m)) det {Fiiuj)) . (47)

Remarkably, we find that det Fi{uj) is given by the same formula as that in
Eq. (pTl), that is det Fiiuj) = det hi{zj). One has only to replace 2s by 7 and
take N = 'yg — g + 1 (instead of = 2s{g — 1) — + 1, as it was in Eq.

(p?!)). One can then verify that Eq. (|^) is indeed satisfied. Moreover, the
characteristics a and b are uniquely fixed by the boundary condition. We are
not surprised that det Fi{uj) is given by Eq. (|27| ) because both of them are
the determinants of the holomorphic sections of bundles.

If filling u = 1/m, the Laughlin wave functions are given by, \E'ji =
YliX{ui)'^'j with \E'j taking the same form as Eq. (|36D . However, now we
shall take Q = Qi = Q2 = 7 — m, 7 = $/(7 compared with Q = 2B — m
and B = ^/2{g — 1) in the case of the Poincare metric. Always, we have the
relation m{N — 1 + (7) = $. The wave functions shall satisfy the boundary

condition

\E''(Mj + Qn + m) = exp{—i'n''~fnQn — 2Ti'^nUi

—i'~f7mm + ia{n,'m))'$'{ui). (48)

and the characteristics a and b in Eq. (36) can be fixed by the boundary con

dition, e.g., Eq. (^Sf ). The characteristics are given b = bo, a = ao + l/m. k =
1, ■ ■ ■ , m and i = 1, - ■ ■ ,g, where and 60 depend on the boundary value
parameters a{n,m). It is easy to see that the degeneracy of the Laughlin
wave functions is also equal to mg — g + 1.

By making continuation of 7, 7 can be fractional, although A^ and $
are always integers. Now we can show how to obtain the ground state wave
functions of a particle interacting with a constant magnetic field with the
C^M metric in the case of fractional 7. When 'yg > 2g — 2 and 7 being
fractional, the degeneracy of the ground states is still given hj N = •yg — g + l
and the wave function of the electrons at filling z/ = 1 is still given by Eq.
(pTl) multiplied by YliX{ui). The wave function of a single particle can be
obtained by fixing the coordinates of other particles in the wave function of
the electrons at filling u = 1 in this case.

19

5.3 The degeneracy of the Laughhn state, a general
discussion

We have show that the degeneracy of some Laughhn states in the last two
subsections is mg — g-\-l and we will try to show here that, generally, the de-
generacy of Laughlin states is mg — g + 1 under some reasonable assumptions.
The Laughlin type wave function is the many particle wave function which
looks like = F{zi, ■■■,zn) Ili<j[fizi, Zj)]"^, where f{zi, Zj) = -f{zj, Zi)
and it is a ftmction on holomorphic coordinates Zi and Zj. Furthermore when
Zi approaches Zj, f{zi,Zj) is proportional to Zi — Zj and only when Zi = zj,
f{zi,Zj) = 0. The only function with those properties on Riemann surfaces is
the prime form function E{zi, zj). Because every particle stays in the lowest
Landau level, so (P^. — Az^)^JL — 0, Hence the Laughhn wave function will
be

N . N

*JL = n cxp[ J ^[E{zi, Zi)^ X F'{z^, ■■■,zn) (49)

i=l i<j

where F'{zi) is a function of holomorphic coordinates Zi. F' shall be deter-
mined by the boundary condition on the surface which is compatible with
the Hamiltonian. Suppose that the magnetic field is smooth enough, we ex-
pect that has no poles and exp[/ A^fdzi] has no zeros and poles. We
have shown that m{N — 1 + (7) = $ for the Laughlin states in the last two
subsection and offered a mathematical explanation of this relation. Thus we
can assume that m{N — 1 -|- ^f) = $ is true for any Laughlin states. Be-
cause the degree is equal to so \E'jl has $ zeros with respect to every
coordinate. The number of zeros (counting the order of the zeros) in the
function Yl.i^j[E(zi, Zj)]"^ is m{N — 1) with respect to Zi. So the remaining
$ — m(A^ — 1) = mg zeros are contained in the function F'. Suppose we have
solutions F', thus = is a meromorphic function with respect to Zi,

where F[ is one of the solutions (possibly some zeros in F/ cancel some zeros
in F[). Prom the previous discussion, we make an assumption that Gj is a
function of the center coordinate J2i ^i- Because the meromorphic function
can be always given by one 9 function divided by another 9 function, so the
meromorphic function with poles at the points which lie on some zeros of the

20

function F[ is given by

G,

[mulmQ)

{mu\mQ)

(50)

where now u = J2i I^' and 6 {mu\mQ) has same zeros as By
Riemann-Roch theorem, the number of such hnear independent meromor-
phic functions is mg — g + 1 for m > 1 (m = 1 is the case of the integer
QHE and the degeneracy of the Hall state is one). Thus the number of the
linear independent functions F- or the degeneracy of the Laughlin states is
mg — g + 1. However in Refs. [22, 23], it was pointed out that the degeneracy
of the Laughlin states is s on the surface with g handles. In Ref.

Wen and Niu analyzed the Chern-Simons effective theory of the FQHE to
get the degeneracy of the Laughlin states. In the Chern-Simons theory, there
are so called large components of gauge fields (for example, Ref. [0]) and
one part of the wave function is Fl(A) = 9 i'mu + mA\m^l), where A

is the large component of the gauge field, oq + ^,&o take values in R^/Z^
and ao, bo is dependent on the boundary condition. The phase space of A is
Jacobian variety C^/Z^ + QZ^ . Because A is now a dynamical variable, all
functions Fl{A) are independent with each other. Thus the degeneracy of
the Laughlin states is m^. However if we suppose that ^ is a constant vector,
the number of the linear independent functions among Fl{A) is mg — + 1.

6 Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Professors B. Dubrovin and K.S. Narain for many use-
ful conversations. The work is partially supported by EEC, Science Project
SCr-CT92-0789.

21

References

[1] R. Prange and S. Girvin, The Quantum Hall Effect (Springer- Verlag, New York,

Heidelberg, 1990, 2nd cd).

[2] M.C. Gutzwiller, Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics (Springer- Verlag,
1990).

[3] J. Fay, American Mathematical Society, Memoirs, no. 464 (Providence, Rhode Is-
land, 1992).

[4] A. Comtet, Annals of Phys. 173(1987)185.

[5] M. Antoine, A. Comtet, and S. Ouvry, J. Phys. A23(1990)3699.

[6] J.E. Avron, M. Klein, A. Pnueh and L. Sadun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69(1992)128; ref-
erences therein.

[7] D. Hejhal, Lecture Notes in Mathematics Vol. 548 (Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1976),
Pt. 1; ibid.. Lecture Notes in Mathematics Vol. 1001 (Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1983),
Pt. 2.

[8] M. Asorey, J. Geom. and Phys. (to be published).

[9] L. Alvarez-Gaumc and P. Nelson, in Proceedings of the Trieste Spring School, 1986.
[10] J. Bolte and F. Steiner, J. Phys. A24(1991)3817.

[11] E. Arbarello, M. Cornalba, P.A. Griffiths and J. Harris, Geometry of Algebraic
Curves, Volume I (Springer- Verlag, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Tokyo, 1985);

[12] H.M. Farkas and L Kra, Riemann Surfaces (Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1980).

[13] R. lengo and K. Lechner, Phys. Rep. C213(1992)179 ; and references therein.

[14] P. Buser, Geometry and Spectra of Compact Riemann Surface, Progress in Mathe-
matics, Vol. 106 (Birkhauser, Boston, Basel, Stuttgart, 1992).

[15] R. lengo and B. Ivanov, Phys. Lett. B 203(1988)89.

[16] V. Knizhnik, Phys. Lett. B180, 247 (1986).

[17] E. D'Hoker and D.H. Phong, Rev. of Mod. Phys 60(1988)917; and references therein.

[18] B. Shiffman and A.J. Sommese, Vanishing Theorems on Complex manifolds.
Progress in Mathematics, Vol. 56 (Birkhauser, Boston, Basel, Stuttgart, 1985).

22

[19] D. Li, Intrinsic quasiparticle's spin and fractional quantum Hall effect on Riemann
surfaces, SISSA/ISAS/53/93/EP.

[20] E. Verlinde and H. Verlindc, Nucl. Phys. B 288, 357 (1987).

[21] D. Li, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B30(1993)2655; Int. J. Mod. Phys. B. (to be published).

[22] G. Moore and N. Read, Nucl. Phys. B360(1991)362.

[23] X.G. Wen and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. B41 (1990)9377.

[24] M. Bos and V.P. Nair, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A5(1990)959.

23